F4D Skyray 1/48 Decals

Photo via Tailhook Association

Furball is about to release 1/48 decals for several different F4D aircraft. See my updated blog on the F4D for details: http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2010/10/bat-out-of-hell.html

F3H Demon Decals - 1/48

 Furball has just released a set of 1/48 decals for various colorful F3H-2s and 2Ms. For a summary description and review, click HERE.

For my summary of the XF3H, F3H-1, and F3H-2 configurations, click HERE.

Late Model F-14 Configurations

I can't do any better than this excellent illustrated synopsis by Brian "Oompa" Marbrey: http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=234910566&hl

For my discussion of the unique F-14 main landing gear side brace, see: http://thanlont.blogspot.com/2012/01/carrier-based-airplanes-weigh-more.html

AD Skyraider Modeling Notes Redux

I've added some more information and illustrations on the nose flaps and the asymmetric fin to the AD Skyraider Modeling Notes here: http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2011/10/ad-skyraider-modeling-notes.html

Nuclear Banshees Redux

Thanks to the Gerald Balzer collection as channeled by Mark Nankivil, I now have much better pictures of Mk 7 and Mk 8 nuclear weapons loaded on the F2H-3/4 Banshee. (Note that in the picture above, this -4 does not have the triangular fairing on the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer that was added to cover an aft fuselage stiffening modification.) As a result, I've updated the Nuclear Banshee post here: http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2009/11/nuclear-banshees.html

F9F-3 Panther

The only notable differences that I know of between the Grumman F9F-2 and -3 is that 1) the -2 was powered by a P&W J42 engine and the -3, an Allison J33 and 2) the -3 with the J33 engine was never modified to carry bombs or rockets as the -2 was. The -3 was delivered first, to VF-51 to replace their FJ-1s. The picture above was taken during carrier qualifications aboard Boxer. Only 54 F9F-3s were produced; most had the J42s substituted for the lower-thrust J33s and were redesignated as -2s. According to Baugher (http://www.joebaugher.com/navy_fighters/f9_3.html), the changeover was accomplished in October 1949; however, that may have been when the first ones were converted because VF-51 and VF-52 were reportedly at sea with them in 1950 off Korea.

The earliest F9F-3s and -2s also appear to have a slightly different ejection seat headrest. See  http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2016/03/early-us-navy-ejection-seat.html

I'm therefore not sure whether VF-51 deployed with -3s per se. It and sister squadron VF-52 were aboard Valley Forge in the western pacific in mid-1950, just in time to be in on the start of the Korean War. LT(jg) Leonard H. Plog of VF-51, reportedly flying a -3 (BuNo 123071, modex 109S), made the first carrier-based jet kill, a North Korean Yak-9., in July 1950

A picture of VF-51 F9F-3s, according to the caption, deployed aboard Valley Forge is provided below. Note the lack of "Navy" and "VF-51" on the side of the aft fuselage, the unusually large number on the nose, and the large "104S" under the left wing. The later markings would be smaller and in addition to "Navy"and the squadron identification on the fuselage, there would be "Navy" on the underside of the left wing. The erosion-resistant leading edge treatment (see http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2012/01/corogard.html) on the leading edge of the wing, inlet, tip tank, and empennage is also clearly less wide on these F9F-3s:

Hobbyboss has  recently released a 1/72 kit of the F9F-3. I don't know if they have corrected the errors in their F9F-2 kit (see http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2011/05/172nd-f9f-2-panther.html).  Markings are provided for VF-51. However, VF-51 made a second Korean war deployment, only in -2s aboard Essex, and it appears that the markings in the kit are those of VF-51's F9F-2s, not its F9F-3s. In the photos I've seen so far like the ones above that are definitely VF-51 F9F-3s, neither "Navy" nor "VF-51" is marked on the aft fuselage. In a movie clip, I did note a red area at the top of the fin and on the nose, unlike the above. F9F-3 109S reportedly never got a kill marking, either, as shown in some illustrations.  (See www.history.navy.mil/nan/backissues/1990s/1997/mj97/plog.pdf)

In any event, the stores pylons should not be used; the J33-powered F9F-3 were never modified to carry rockets as shown on the box art like the -2s were.

F-111B Redux

Late last year, I found more F-111B photographs as well as bits and pieces of documentation in the files at the Grumman History Center. I've used them to update on the F-111B post (http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2009/10/grumman-f-111b.html) with better illustrations of the various tailhook installations, the short-nose forward fuselage shape, and the nose landing gear.