by Tommy H. Thomason

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Sea Blue vs. Insignia Blue

I usually stay away from color stuff because it's not one of my areas of expertise and it's fraught with potential for error, which I prefer to avoid. This post is therefore for discussion purposes, not to provide a definitive color statement.

Toward the end of World War II, the complex Navy camouflage scheme for carrier-based aircraft was gradually replaced with an overall Sea Blue color. However, the national insignia was retained intact. This provided examples that directly compare Sea Blue and Insignia Blue. (Note that the colors may not have been accurately depicted in the original that I scanned, much less on your computer screen.)


It was eventually suggested, probably by Grumman, that the Insignia Blue surround of the national insignia was redundant and should be eliminated on all-blue airplanes. It was reportedly deleted well before the official authorization to do so was issued in June 1946.

A red bar was added in January 1947 to reinstate all the colors of the U.S. flag.*

 (This F4U would appear to have spent some time ashore in its recent past...)

I like the color in the picture above but it appears to be lighter and bluer than Sea Blue color chips from Elliott, et al. Here are the current Federal Standard colors (Insignia Blue = 15044; gloss Sea Blue = 15042) according to Colorserver:
http://www.colorserver.net/showcolor.asp?fs=15044+15042

The sea-blue story is complicated by the fact that according to Dana Bell, "There were two completely different versions of ANA 623 Glossy Sea Blue. Citing the instability of the original pigments, in 1947 BuAer reformulated the color and issued new color chips. Modelers have been arguing about this for years, not realizing that some of us have the early chip (on heavy card stock) and others the newer chip (on a metal plate). The newer chip is indeed darker and is also a bit greener."

*Note that action with respect to authorization often occurred in due course. How else to explain this F4U national insignia that still has the Insignia Blue surround and also the red bar?


The picture is obviously too green; here is an auto correction, which looks about right:

That the bar is faded may be indicative of it being added in the field with paint at hand.

My impression is that Grumman painted overall-blue F6Fs with paint that didn't fade as dramatically.

3 comments:

  1. Certainly interesting in light of all the old model kits where decals had to be replaced. I wonder, how far into the 1950's this may have continued?
    Also, another question. On Wikipedia, there is an image of what is labelled "AU-1". The cowling looks right, but the wings appear to be fabric covered. Was this the case with early models?
    This is the image in question -
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/AU-1_Corsair_in_flight_1952.jpg
    Thanks as well for providing what has proven to be hours of distraction at work.

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  2. Based on the 20mm cannon armament and five big wing pylons, that is an AU-1, probably an early one. It looks like the outboard wing panels are partially fabric covered, which was the case up through the F4U-4, but the -5, -7, and AU-1 had metal skins there. It may simply be the lighting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Found another shot of the same plane (probably same session), and the wings grow ever more suspect. Lack of squadron markings might indicate... prototype?
    http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/28748/AU-1.jpg

    ReplyDelete