Thursday, December 6, 2012

Cockpit Confusion

In response to a request for a picture of the F7U-3 cockpit, I did some research and while I'm still not sure what it looked like, I did come across some interesting stuff. To me, at least.

First, cockpits of airplanes changed over time so a picture may not be representative of the airplane being modeled. What's worse, some cockpit photos are of airplanes in flight test with switches and instruments that have been added for purposes of the test. For example, this is the instrument panel of an early F7U, BuNo 128452, used for spin test.
Clearly the stuff that's up on the glare shield is test equipment. The two prominent T handles on the left side are for spin chute deployment and jettison. The location of any instrument in this picture can't be relied on for an operational cockpit but you can note that the instrument panel was curved, meaning each instrument and switch was roughly equidistant from the pilot.

This is the instrument panel of early production F7U-3s, BuNos 128467-78. Note that the cover marked "glass" protects the lens that projects the gun aiming image on the windscreen.
The "dark" instrument that looks like a radar screen is really the artificial horizon. F7Us, apparently including the -3M (more on that later), did not have visual-assist radars.

This is a photo taken by Don Hinton of the cockpit of F7U-3 BuNo 129554 at the Museum of Flight Restoration Center at Paine Field in Everett, Washington. The cockpit appears to be pretty stock. It appears that the artificial horizon and the directional gyro on the far right of the instrument do protrude out from the panel.
This is a picture of the same cockpit from a slightly different angle, now with a dummy sitting on the ejection seat. Unfortunately, I don't know who the photographer was.

The next picture is really confusing. It is BuNo 129590, which was an F7U-3 as far as I know. It has the F7U-3 gunsight. However, it also has the "zero reader" (it looks like an ILS indicator) and a range indicator immediately above it that I associate with the F7U-3M cockpit. The big ammeter mounted to the bottom of the glare shield doesn't appear to belong in an operational cockpit. I think the thing blocking the gun sight projection lens is a camera to record the image. My guess is that this picture shouldn't be relied on as representative of an operational F7U-3.
(From the National Museum of Naval Aviation)

Speaking of the F7U-3M, it appears to me that its AERO 10E Armament Control System (APQ-51 plus Mk16 MOD 4 Armament Fire Control System) as incorporated in the Sparrow I-armed Cutlass did not include a radar scope for its APQ-51, per se. In lieu of a radar scope, the pilot was given two gauges, one showing the direction of the object that Fire Control System had locked on to and the other, the range to the object in yards as well as a light that indicated a lock on had occurred:


My current guess is that when the Armament Control System locked on something, the pilot could point the airplane at whatever it was using the zero reader (the instrument just to the right of the turn-and-bank indicator), and more precisely aim the radar beam using a different gun sight from the one provided in the F7U-3. Or the pilot used the gun sight to be sure the radar was locked on to something that needed to be shot down and/or aim it at something he wanted to shoot down. I don't know.

The BIS Service Acceptance Trials report noted that the armament system would lock on to the bullet stream when the guns were fired (as indicated by the illumination of the lock-on light and the rapidly increasing range) if it wasn't already locked on to something.

As background, the Sparrow I missile was a beam-rider. It had rearward-oriented antennas that detected where the airplane's radar beam was pointed and "rode the beam" toward the target, so to speak. The shortcoming was the beam got wider the farther it was from the antenna. That meant that it wasn't accurate enough at distances over a couple of miles to get the missile, which was gyrating from side to side and up and down to stay in the beam,  close enough to the target to detect it and detonate the warhead. Aiming at the target through the gunsight might have been necessary to improve the accuracy by refining the lock on. In any event, riding the beam by looking backwards at where it was pointed meant the Sparrow I was only likely to be effective in visual conditions at relatively short ranges.

The Sparrow III, on the other hand, homed in on the radar beam being reflected from the target, which meant that its guidance was getting more and more accurate the closer it got to the target. That made the missile pretty effective as long as the target didn't start maneuvering to evade it.

This is a picture taken in July 1955 of the instrument panel of "YF7U-3M", BuNo 129700, in test at Point Mugu. Note the ammeter on the top of the glare shield and the zero reader to the right of the stick grip with the radar range indicator above the zero reader (the picture of the range to target and zero reader instruments above was cropped from this one). And that there is no visual-assist radar scope. (The instrument behind the stick grip is almost certainly the turn-and-bank indicator.)
(National Archives 80G-669514)

This is a picture of the bench test setup for the "APQ-51 gun sight" for the Point Mugu tests.
(National Archive 80G-669163 cropped)

That's a little confusing because this is a picture taken by Don Hinton of the Cutlass in the National Naval Aviation Museum at Pensacola marked as F7U-3M BuNo 129655. (Why the cautious wording? Because it doesn't have the pylons on the outboard wing panels and 129655 is listed as an F7U-3.) Note that the gun sight is very different from the one pictured above and is also not correct for an F7U-3M as noted by Laurent in his comment on this post. Other instruments are missing or mislocated, e.g. the artificial horizon, so this clearly isn't a stock operational cockpit of an F7U-3, much less an F7U-3M.
It is however, sensationally documented. See http://www.navalaviationmuseum.org/nnam/virtualtour/#MUSEUM/COCKPITS/F7U/F7U. I noted, however, the throttle for the right engine is for an F8U Crusader as indicated by the marking, "Cruise Droop" with an arrow, so modeler, beware.

One thing that I think we can rely on is that some F7U-3 cockpits were pretty much black except for the bottom of the control column and the rudder pedals:

And the ejection seat:


6 comments:

  1. F7U, BuNo 128452 has the most confusing cockpit I could say. Is this the oldest model? Better check it out in museums or on the internet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 128452 was in fact the second F7U-3 and the instruments are arrayed in a somewhat nonstandard manner, not unusual for a prototype/test airplane. However, my point about "confusion" in this instance was with respect to determining what a production F7U-3 instrument panel looked like when the available pictures are of museum airplanes or ones posted on the internet with little or no information about the airplane it was in.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The gunsight fitted to the F7U at the Naval Aviation Museum is in fact a Sight Unit Mk 10 Mod 0 that is part of the Gun Sight Mk 18 Mod 6 system used only in turrets. So its definitely not a gunsight that was ever used on the F7U but more an unfortunate example of a totally wrong instrumentation fitted just to "fill a hole".

    hope this help,

    Laurent
    (Belgium)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just found this very interesting web page, regarding the F7U-3 cockpit variations. Especially, regarding its main control instruments' panel because I'm trying to figure out what was the instruments configuration on a F7U-3 and U-3M.

    I'm trying to build the Cutlass in 1/72 and even though the kit gives the main instrument panel with the "orange" gunsight (projecting info on the windscreen) - if I can call it such, I'm confused when I see photos with the "APQ-51 gun sight".

    So, my question is, did the US NAVY used on operational Cutlasses the aforementioned "APQ-51 gun sight" or, the one with the "orange" glass?

    Many thanks for your time and attention to my message guys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll have to double check sometime in the next few days, but if my memory is correct, the APQ-51 with the integral reflector plate was only on the F7U-3M. The -3 had the sight that projected a reticle onto the windscreen.

      Delete
  5. Many Thanks for your reply Tailspin.

    By the way, I also found a photo of a White-painted Cutlass. From what I read it was used for spin tests and it had mounted a parachute mechanism on the rear. I have tried to locate some photos showing this mechanism but, unfortunately I couldn't find any. What a disappointment because, it would make things a lot easier for my build.

    And one last thing, do you perhaps know the length of the testing probe on the aircraft's nose?

    Again, thank you for your time and reply to my message Tailspin.

    Best,
    Alex.

    ReplyDelete