by Tommy H. Thomason
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Sword 1/72 F9F-8T/TF-9J SW 72093
Sword has just released an injection molded 1/72 Grumman F9F-8T as a follow-on to its F9F-8P. Both are based on the Hasegawa F9F-8 but the tooling, some detail parts, the unique trainer parts, etc are all new. For my much earlier post on the F9F-8T/TF-9J, now updated with information on this kit, see http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2011/02/f8f-8t-cougar.html.
Thursday, June 2, 2016
Sword 1/72nd F3D-2 Skyknight SW 72094
Sword (http://swordmodels.cz/en/) has released its 1/72nd scale F3D Skyknight for a third time with a new set of decals.
Each of the decal options is of interest but one, VMF(N)-513's with a side number of 12 7/8, is extra special, being a superstition-inspired replacement for a side number 13 that came to grief.
Paul Boyer's Fine Scale Modeler review of a previous edition: http://www.finescale.com/reviews/kit-reviews/2014/02/sword-f3d-2-skyknight
My notes: http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-f3ds-of-flying-nightmares-in-korea.html
The description of the very colorful VF-11 F3D states that it flew from FDR. I can't find any record of that. According to Paul Bless, my F3D go-to guy, there were only four F3D deployments, all by VC-4 detachments:
FDR (not Coral Sea) in 1952
Lake Champlain in 1953 (its F3Ds were left behind with the Marines in Korea)
Antietam in 1953 (this was more of an exercise of the first angled deck rather than a deployment, per se, since the Air Group only consisted of Grumman F9F-5s and AFs in addition to the F3Ds).
Note that on all the F3D deployments except the one aboard Midway, the Skyknights retained VC-4's tail code of NA. Changing to C when aboard Midway was a very early example of a detachment adopting the tail code of the air group it was assigned to. (Decals for a VC-4 F3D with the NA tail code were provided in SW 72074.)
There were other F3D trips aboard of course. In addition to the original at-sea trials, VX-4 participated in Project Steam aboard Hancock; VF-14 qualified from Intrepid in October/November 1954 but did not deploy with it: and VF-14 F3Ds were used to ferry high-level defense department executives to Forrestal in February 1956.
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
Creating a Sikorsky SH-3D from the New Airfix Sea King HAR.3
By Jodie Peeler, guest poster (and my SH-3 subject-matter expert):
A few years back when Cyber-Hobby released its SH-3D kit, I wrote an article for this blog on how to convert it into a more accurate SH-3 (http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2013/04/cyber-hobby-sh-3d-build-by-jodie-peeler.html). At the time, even with its flaws and some aggravation in the assembly process, the Cyber-Hobby kit was the best representation I'd found of a Sea King in 1:72. Airfix, however, has changed all this with its new HAR.3 kit.
Having just converted one into an SH-3D, I believe there's a new winner in the Sea King sweepstakes.
The Airfix HAR.3 is tooled as a late version; it is equipped with composite main-rotor blades and has several type-specific bumps, boxes and plates molded in place. The sonar well is plated over, and the interior is equipped as an HAR.3 would be. You'll have to remove or alter certain features; you'll also have to scrounge or scratch build certain others, such as the chin fairing and strobe, and the ADF fairing on the tail. However, you do get several interesting features, such as an ice/spray shield that could be reworked for an SH-3. You also get an option for a folded tail that actually includes a representation of what you see when the tail is folded. This is also the first Sea King kit I can recall that includes a cabin ceiling. That's a welcome feature.
The Cyber-Hobby kit impresses you with lots of CAD-induced detailing and fine engraving. Airfix doesn't give you that kind of eye-popping detail. Where Airfix does excel is in areas much more fundamental: providing a much less troublesome build experience, and a finished model that captures the look of the real thing in a way I haven't seen in 1:72 before.
I didn't take a lot of photos during this build, as my main focus was on build impressions. You will see flaws and errors, and you'll see some mistakes, some of them hilarious. Learn from what I did as you work on your own.
INTERIOR:
Airfix gives you a very nice cabin interior with good engraving and a lot of indentations for mounting troop seats. The underside has several points where slots may be cut out or additional holes may be drilled, depending on which variant you're building. The cockpit is good but basic, with instrument panels represented by simple decals. For most modelers, what you get in the kit will do just fine.
Since I was building an SH-3, I filled most of the seat mounting holes in the main cabin before installing the crew positions and scratch-built consoles on the starboard side. The sling seats are reasonably good, and I mounted a four-seat section opposite the starboard cabin door. As I was building an Apollo recovery helicopter (see http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2015/06/sikorsky-sh-3d-buno-152711-old-66.html), I didn't bother with adding the sonar array to the cabin.
In the cockpit, I cut away some of the molded-in bulkhead plating to represent an SH-3 configuration. I didn't do a lot to the cockpit, aside from adding a few strands of cabling to the aft bulkhead. The kit's cockpit seats can be converted to reasonable representations of the early SH-3 seats, so I just added some braces and made some seat belts from painted tape. I used the instrument panel decals for the sake of speed; they work well enough at viewing distance.
On the fuselage interior, I added the prominent stringers and some cabling. You'll need to blank off a few window openings and conceal some other areas, which I did with strategic use of .005" sheet. I also added the "curtain" that many SH-3s had at the rear of the main cabin, too; this was cut from styrene sheet.
This all sounds like involved work, but it was really not a lot of trouble, and most of the time I spent was on adding extra detail that is mostly hidden in the finished model.
FUSELAGE:
Airfix follows the now-standard Sea King fuselage breakdown of two fuselage halves, separate hull bottom, and separate tail section. The cabin ceiling piece does double duty as a section of the port fuselage, which is a clever piece of engineering that actually works well.
Most of your fuselage work will be on removing what shouldn't be there on an SH-3, and filling in some windows. Delete the aft observer windows on both sides, and the forward port-side mid-cabin window. Aft of the exhaust opening on the port side, grind off the bulge Westland introduced, fill and sand everything smooth, and rescribe. Use your references to figure out what other bumps and boxes need to be removed for the specific SH-3 you plan to represent. (See http://tailhooktopics.blogspot.com/2013/02/us-navy-asw-sh-3-sea-king-variations.html for some variations.) Relocate the fueling point access from just aft of the starboard cabin door to beneath the cabin door.
The hull bottom has some molded-in features that must be removed, and most everything that looks like a box needs to go. There will be some patching, but it isn't too difficult. Perhaps the trickiest part will be dealing with the sonar well cover. On mine, I measured out the center of the well cover and carefully drilled it open, leaving just the very edge of the cover as the lip of the sonar well. I installed a short section of Evergreen tube to represent the well interior; since the sonar was removed for Apollo duty, I didn't bother with more than just a blanking plate.
The separate tail poses no issues worth noting, although if you plan to build your Sea King with the tail locked in place, you'll want to do a lot of test-fitting along the way just to be safe.
The sponsons are very nicely done, although the gear wells have no detail worth noting. The landing gear must be installed when you assemble the sponson halves, which is a little bit of a pain to work
around. The port sponson has a raised plate that you'll need to grind off. I also detailed the gear struts a little before I installed them.
ROTORS:
I break this out into its own section because of a couple of issues. The first is that the main rotor blades are the composite variants, which have a very different shape from the metal blades you'd see on an SH-3. It is possible to convert the Airfix blades with some very careful cutting and sanding. However, this has to be done *very* carefully, because the Airfix blades are molded thin and will break easily if you're not careful. I found this out the hard way.
The other issue relates to the folded-rotor option. This is a very nice touch, but from the box the outer blades are molded to sit "flat" alongside the others. They need to sit more "down and out," as you can
see here:
https://img.planespotters.net/photo/387000/original/zh540-royal-air-force-westland-sea-king-har3a_PlanespottersNet_387145.jpg
http://www.britmodeller.com/walkarounds/helos/seaking_sh3/Seaking_000_01.JPG
I cut the blades from their attachment points, drilled holes and made mounting points with wire, and reattached the blades in their proper positions during final assembly.
ASSEMBLY NOTES:
Once the modifications are done, the Sea King kit is typical modern Airfix: easy assembly, clever engineering, and just a lot of fun to build. I didn't encounter much trouble, and what little trouble I
encountered was mostly of my own making.
There will be some minor scratch building along the way, mainly the chin fairing with strobe and the ADF fairing on the tail. I used drawings and photos in "Famous Aircraft of the World No. 15" to help me build those from laminated styrene sheet.
Use caution when mounting the sponsons to the fuselage. It can be tricky to get everything aligned, and the assembly can be delicate once it's done. Since you have to install the landing gear before you assemble the sponson halves, any alignment errors will get magnified.
The clear cockpit cab looks like a nightmare to assemble, but in reality it goes together very well if you are patient and do a little dry-fitting. Clean up the seams very carefully. You will be rewarded
with a Sea King that has the best "face" of any I've yet seen. Unlike the Cyber-Hobby kit, there's no overly-close tolerances or hidden trouble. Just make sure everything's properly aligned before the glue sets.
Like the Cyber-Hobby kit, you have the option of open doors on both sides. Airfix's port door is marred by ejector pin markings inside the steps, and they're hard to clean up, so I cut little strips of Evergreen stock to hide them. The steps will also benefit from some detailing, and I added some reinforcement plates and drilled some holes to more closely match references.
The starboard cabin door is molded in clear plastic so you don't have a window seam to worry about, but it will require very careful removal of some Westland-specific features. Take your time and work very carefully.
In the kit, the hoist winch mounts to its struts a little higher than it would on an SH-3. I just trimmed the winch bracket down, mounted the winch body in the correct spot, and filled over the mounting gap. Easy enough.
You don't get any exterior mounting points or weapons shackles in the Airfix kit, so you'll have to scratch build any of that stuff you want. For this model, I just went with basic representations from the scrap plastic bin, and scratch built the recovery cameras and other equipment as needed.
From there, I finished the model as I would any other Sea King of the period. Decals are from the Old 66 Decals set (http://www.starfighter-decals.com/old-66-deca66.html) for the Apollo 13 recovery, and I chose that markings option because everybody out there in Internet land loves that darn alleygator. (Click HERE for a review of the most recent edition.)
You don't get much in the way of recessed vents or grilles needed for an SH-3, so I created some in Illustrator and printed them on a laser printer. They help add some of the necessary "busy" to the airframe. Fuselage antennas were added from brass posts and invisible thread. I also spruced up the folded tail with some brass wire and Evergreen bits; not perfect, but it keeps the eye happy.
Some comparison photos of the forward fuselage of the Airfix and Cyber-Hobby Sea Kings. The Airfix kit is "Old 66" with no shield in front of the engine inlets:
CONCLUSIONS:
Airfix's new Sea King kits may lack the impressive detail of the Cyber-Hobby kits, but they do succeed in areas much more fundamental: a better build experience, and in getting the fundamentals correct. My own feeling is that Airfix took the time to really understand the Sea King airframe, and this helped the kit designers capture how the real thing looks. It is a simpler kit than the Cyber-Hobby offering, but the Airfix kit gets it right in ways Cyber-Hobby didn't - and does so for half the price, too.
From the way the Airfix kit is engineered, it would take some serious tool changes or additions to get an accurate SH-3 release. Whether Airfix has a surprise up its sleeve, I don't know. It wouldn't be
difficult, though, for an aftermarket firm or a CAD/3D-print designer to tool up a nice conversion set for the Airfix kit and provide the missing pieces. This kit would justify the effort.
If you're wanting to build a 1:72 Sea King, get this kit. It blows the doors off all the other options.
A few years back when Cyber-Hobby released its SH-3D kit, I wrote an article for this blog on how to convert it into a more accurate SH-3 (http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2013/04/cyber-hobby-sh-3d-build-by-jodie-peeler.html). At the time, even with its flaws and some aggravation in the assembly process, the Cyber-Hobby kit was the best representation I'd found of a Sea King in 1:72. Airfix, however, has changed all this with its new HAR.3 kit.
Having just converted one into an SH-3D, I believe there's a new winner in the Sea King sweepstakes.
The Airfix HAR.3 is tooled as a late version; it is equipped with composite main-rotor blades and has several type-specific bumps, boxes and plates molded in place. The sonar well is plated over, and the interior is equipped as an HAR.3 would be. You'll have to remove or alter certain features; you'll also have to scrounge or scratch build certain others, such as the chin fairing and strobe, and the ADF fairing on the tail. However, you do get several interesting features, such as an ice/spray shield that could be reworked for an SH-3. You also get an option for a folded tail that actually includes a representation of what you see when the tail is folded. This is also the first Sea King kit I can recall that includes a cabin ceiling. That's a welcome feature.
The Cyber-Hobby kit impresses you with lots of CAD-induced detailing and fine engraving. Airfix doesn't give you that kind of eye-popping detail. Where Airfix does excel is in areas much more fundamental: providing a much less troublesome build experience, and a finished model that captures the look of the real thing in a way I haven't seen in 1:72 before.
I didn't take a lot of photos during this build, as my main focus was on build impressions. You will see flaws and errors, and you'll see some mistakes, some of them hilarious. Learn from what I did as you work on your own.
INTERIOR:
Airfix gives you a very nice cabin interior with good engraving and a lot of indentations for mounting troop seats. The underside has several points where slots may be cut out or additional holes may be drilled, depending on which variant you're building. The cockpit is good but basic, with instrument panels represented by simple decals. For most modelers, what you get in the kit will do just fine.
Since I was building an SH-3, I filled most of the seat mounting holes in the main cabin before installing the crew positions and scratch-built consoles on the starboard side. The sling seats are reasonably good, and I mounted a four-seat section opposite the starboard cabin door. As I was building an Apollo recovery helicopter (see http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2015/06/sikorsky-sh-3d-buno-152711-old-66.html), I didn't bother with adding the sonar array to the cabin.
In the cockpit, I cut away some of the molded-in bulkhead plating to represent an SH-3 configuration. I didn't do a lot to the cockpit, aside from adding a few strands of cabling to the aft bulkhead. The kit's cockpit seats can be converted to reasonable representations of the early SH-3 seats, so I just added some braces and made some seat belts from painted tape. I used the instrument panel decals for the sake of speed; they work well enough at viewing distance.
On the fuselage interior, I added the prominent stringers and some cabling. You'll need to blank off a few window openings and conceal some other areas, which I did with strategic use of .005" sheet. I also added the "curtain" that many SH-3s had at the rear of the main cabin, too; this was cut from styrene sheet.
This all sounds like involved work, but it was really not a lot of trouble, and most of the time I spent was on adding extra detail that is mostly hidden in the finished model.
FUSELAGE:
Airfix follows the now-standard Sea King fuselage breakdown of two fuselage halves, separate hull bottom, and separate tail section. The cabin ceiling piece does double duty as a section of the port fuselage, which is a clever piece of engineering that actually works well.
Most of your fuselage work will be on removing what shouldn't be there on an SH-3, and filling in some windows. Delete the aft observer windows on both sides, and the forward port-side mid-cabin window. Aft of the exhaust opening on the port side, grind off the bulge Westland introduced, fill and sand everything smooth, and rescribe. Use your references to figure out what other bumps and boxes need to be removed for the specific SH-3 you plan to represent. (See http://tailhooktopics.blogspot.com/2013/02/us-navy-asw-sh-3-sea-king-variations.html for some variations.) Relocate the fueling point access from just aft of the starboard cabin door to beneath the cabin door.
The hull bottom has some molded-in features that must be removed, and most everything that looks like a box needs to go. There will be some patching, but it isn't too difficult. Perhaps the trickiest part will be dealing with the sonar well cover. On mine, I measured out the center of the well cover and carefully drilled it open, leaving just the very edge of the cover as the lip of the sonar well. I installed a short section of Evergreen tube to represent the well interior; since the sonar was removed for Apollo duty, I didn't bother with more than just a blanking plate.
The separate tail poses no issues worth noting, although if you plan to build your Sea King with the tail locked in place, you'll want to do a lot of test-fitting along the way just to be safe.
The sponsons are very nicely done, although the gear wells have no detail worth noting. The landing gear must be installed when you assemble the sponson halves, which is a little bit of a pain to work
around. The port sponson has a raised plate that you'll need to grind off. I also detailed the gear struts a little before I installed them.
ROTORS:
I break this out into its own section because of a couple of issues. The first is that the main rotor blades are the composite variants, which have a very different shape from the metal blades you'd see on an SH-3. It is possible to convert the Airfix blades with some very careful cutting and sanding. However, this has to be done *very* carefully, because the Airfix blades are molded thin and will break easily if you're not careful. I found this out the hard way.
The other issue relates to the folded-rotor option. This is a very nice touch, but from the box the outer blades are molded to sit "flat" alongside the others. They need to sit more "down and out," as you can
see here:
https://img.planespotters.net/photo/387000/original/zh540-royal-air-force-westland-sea-king-har3a_PlanespottersNet_387145.jpg
http://www.britmodeller.com/walkarounds/helos/seaking_sh3/Seaking_000_01.JPG
I cut the blades from their attachment points, drilled holes and made mounting points with wire, and reattached the blades in their proper positions during final assembly.
ASSEMBLY NOTES:
Once the modifications are done, the Sea King kit is typical modern Airfix: easy assembly, clever engineering, and just a lot of fun to build. I didn't encounter much trouble, and what little trouble I
encountered was mostly of my own making.
There will be some minor scratch building along the way, mainly the chin fairing with strobe and the ADF fairing on the tail. I used drawings and photos in "Famous Aircraft of the World No. 15" to help me build those from laminated styrene sheet.
Use caution when mounting the sponsons to the fuselage. It can be tricky to get everything aligned, and the assembly can be delicate once it's done. Since you have to install the landing gear before you assemble the sponson halves, any alignment errors will get magnified.
The clear cockpit cab looks like a nightmare to assemble, but in reality it goes together very well if you are patient and do a little dry-fitting. Clean up the seams very carefully. You will be rewarded
with a Sea King that has the best "face" of any I've yet seen. Unlike the Cyber-Hobby kit, there's no overly-close tolerances or hidden trouble. Just make sure everything's properly aligned before the glue sets.
Like the Cyber-Hobby kit, you have the option of open doors on both sides. Airfix's port door is marred by ejector pin markings inside the steps, and they're hard to clean up, so I cut little strips of Evergreen stock to hide them. The steps will also benefit from some detailing, and I added some reinforcement plates and drilled some holes to more closely match references.
The starboard cabin door is molded in clear plastic so you don't have a window seam to worry about, but it will require very careful removal of some Westland-specific features. Take your time and work very carefully.
In the kit, the hoist winch mounts to its struts a little higher than it would on an SH-3. I just trimmed the winch bracket down, mounted the winch body in the correct spot, and filled over the mounting gap. Easy enough.
You don't get any exterior mounting points or weapons shackles in the Airfix kit, so you'll have to scratch build any of that stuff you want. For this model, I just went with basic representations from the scrap plastic bin, and scratch built the recovery cameras and other equipment as needed.
From there, I finished the model as I would any other Sea King of the period. Decals are from the Old 66 Decals set (http://www.starfighter-decals.com/old-66-deca66.html) for the Apollo 13 recovery, and I chose that markings option because everybody out there in Internet land loves that darn alleygator. (Click HERE for a review of the most recent edition.)
You don't get much in the way of recessed vents or grilles needed for an SH-3, so I created some in Illustrator and printed them on a laser printer. They help add some of the necessary "busy" to the airframe. Fuselage antennas were added from brass posts and invisible thread. I also spruced up the folded tail with some brass wire and Evergreen bits; not perfect, but it keeps the eye happy.
Some comparison photos of the forward fuselage of the Airfix and Cyber-Hobby Sea Kings. The Airfix kit is "Old 66" with no shield in front of the engine inlets:
CONCLUSIONS:
Airfix's new Sea King kits may lack the impressive detail of the Cyber-Hobby kits, but they do succeed in areas much more fundamental: a better build experience, and in getting the fundamentals correct. My own feeling is that Airfix took the time to really understand the Sea King airframe, and this helped the kit designers capture how the real thing looks. It is a simpler kit than the Cyber-Hobby offering, but the Airfix kit gets it right in ways Cyber-Hobby didn't - and does so for half the price, too.
From the way the Airfix kit is engineered, it would take some serious tool changes or additions to get an accurate SH-3 release. Whether Airfix has a surprise up its sleeve, I don't know. It wouldn't be
difficult, though, for an aftermarket firm or a CAD/3D-print designer to tool up a nice conversion set for the Airfix kit and provide the missing pieces. This kit would justify the effort.
If you're wanting to build a 1:72 Sea King, get this kit. It blows the doors off all the other options.
Monday, May 9, 2016
Grumman XF10F Jaguar
I've just updated my XF10F Jaguar post in Tailhook Topics Draft with a pretty good three-view drawing and a description of the configuration changes during the first and only year of its flight test. See http://tailhooktopics.blogspot.com/2012/06/xf10f-pictures.html
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
AD-5 versus AD-6/7 Main Landing Gear
The AD-5 main landing gear wheel well reverted to the earlier configuration that had no main landing gear doors. The forward facing fairing was also different from the one that accompanied the fully housed landing gear. The catapult hook was also relocated to the main landing gear strut as it was on the earlier AEW Skyraiders (necessary to clear the radome) but made standard for all AD-5s.
The following picture of the AD-5 main landing gear wheel well was cropped from a Jim Robbins photograph of a suspended EA-1F (AD-5Q). On the AD-5, like all ADs, the gear strut, when retracted, was actually below the wing and not in it.
Note that the gear actuator well is symmetrical from side to side but the forward facing fairing is not.
The AD-6/7 wheel well was open from the aft side of forward wing spar (the gear actuation mechanism was attached to its front side) to the aft wing spar.
The following picture of the AD-5 main landing gear wheel well was cropped from a Jim Robbins photograph of a suspended EA-1F (AD-5Q). On the AD-5, like all ADs, the gear strut, when retracted, was actually below the wing and not in it.
Note that the gear actuator well is symmetrical from side to side but the forward facing fairing is not.
The AD-6/7 wheel well was open from the aft side of forward wing spar (the gear actuation mechanism was attached to its front side) to the aft wing spar.
Tuesday, April 26, 2016
Douglas F4D Forward Fuselage Profile
Are you going to believe me or your lying eyes?
During the F4D mock-up review in March 1949, it was determined that the over-the-nose visibility of the specification, critical for a carrier-based airplane, was not adequate for a tailless airplane. The nose of the mock up was therefore cut off ahead of the windscreen and angled downward for a followup review a few weeks later.
Although it looks like the nose of the production F4D is angled slightly downward, I have maintained that the bottom of the forward fuselage is actually flat. The appearance of a downward cant, in my opinion, was an optical illusion created by the angle of the radome's attachment to the fuselage. This was buttressed by a very good Douglas general arrangement drawing (not definitive like a lines drawing would be, but it had clearly been done with care) and a close examination of pictures. This is an example from my post on the F4D, http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2010/10/bat-out-of-hell.html.
However, I was prepared to eat crow after looking at some fairly high resolution F4D pictures recently. There seemed to be a small but nevertheless downward tilt of the bottom of the nose that began at the forward end on the nose landing gear wheel well.
This one had the least clutter in the background and the appearance of the droop so I used it to once again examine the flatness of the nose profile using Illustrator (you can maximize the size of either picture by clicking on it; then double-clicking on the result and selecting view image, which results in an image with a magnifying glass for a cursor; and then clicking again).
I put a fine red line along the bottom of the fuselage as precisely as I could, copied that and pasted it as fat white line just below it, and then inserted identical red circles between the two lines. There may be a droop there, but it's pretty subtle.
During the F4D mock-up review in March 1949, it was determined that the over-the-nose visibility of the specification, critical for a carrier-based airplane, was not adequate for a tailless airplane. The nose of the mock up was therefore cut off ahead of the windscreen and angled downward for a followup review a few weeks later.
Although it looks like the nose of the production F4D is angled slightly downward, I have maintained that the bottom of the forward fuselage is actually flat. The appearance of a downward cant, in my opinion, was an optical illusion created by the angle of the radome's attachment to the fuselage. This was buttressed by a very good Douglas general arrangement drawing (not definitive like a lines drawing would be, but it had clearly been done with care) and a close examination of pictures. This is an example from my post on the F4D, http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2010/10/bat-out-of-hell.html.
However, I was prepared to eat crow after looking at some fairly high resolution F4D pictures recently. There seemed to be a small but nevertheless downward tilt of the bottom of the nose that began at the forward end on the nose landing gear wheel well.
This one had the least clutter in the background and the appearance of the droop so I used it to once again examine the flatness of the nose profile using Illustrator (you can maximize the size of either picture by clicking on it; then double-clicking on the result and selecting view image, which results in an image with a magnifying glass for a cursor; and then clicking again).
I put a fine red line along the bottom of the fuselage as precisely as I could, copied that and pasted it as fat white line just below it, and then inserted identical red circles between the two lines. There may be a droop there, but it's pretty subtle.
Friday, April 22, 2016
AD-5W Belly Detail
Yet another surprise...
The basic AD-5 retained the belly dive brake of the three that were on single-seat Skyraiders, retracting into a well in the belly the same way.
Note how the bottom of the fuselage at the trailing edge of the wing curved into the well.
Since the AD-5W did not need a dive brake, I had assumed that it would have had a panel covering the well (the AD-5Q does). It turns out that the dive brake was removed but the well itself was now the bottom of the fuselage.
Ed Barthelmes, my go-to guy for Skyraider stuff, sent me pictures showing this area and maintenance manual information.
Note that there is an access door in the forward end of the well. This was standard on the AD-5 for "kit conversion and (access to the) electronic equipment compartment". Note also the dark rectangle. This was the cavity to accommodate the retracted dive brake actuator since provisions were retained on the AD-5W for installation of the dive brake.
For more on the AD-5W and the wide-body Skyraiders in general, see:
http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2009/12/widebody-skyraider.html
http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-widebody-skyraider-redux.html (this one has a side-view drawing showing the changing depth of the well)
The basic AD-5 retained the belly dive brake of the three that were on single-seat Skyraiders, retracting into a well in the belly the same way.
Note how the bottom of the fuselage at the trailing edge of the wing curved into the well.
Since the AD-5W did not need a dive brake, I had assumed that it would have had a panel covering the well (the AD-5Q does). It turns out that the dive brake was removed but the well itself was now the bottom of the fuselage.
Ed Barthelmes, my go-to guy for Skyraider stuff, sent me pictures showing this area and maintenance manual information.
Note that there is an access door in the forward end of the well. This was standard on the AD-5 for "kit conversion and (access to the) electronic equipment compartment". Note also the dark rectangle. This was the cavity to accommodate the retracted dive brake actuator since provisions were retained on the AD-5W for installation of the dive brake.
For more on the AD-5W and the wide-body Skyraiders in general, see:
http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2009/12/widebody-skyraider.html
http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-widebody-skyraider-redux.html (this one has a side-view drawing showing the changing depth of the well)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)